Should journalists change quotes? Ever?

 

Some of you have said something similar to this in class:

The truth, according to writer and journalist Janet Malcolm, is “messy, incoherent, aimless, boring, absurd…the truth does not make a good story; that’s why we have art.” She also compared accuracy to a shapeless housecoat.

But what about people’s quotes?  How should a journalist deal with editing messy or incoherent or downright boring quotes from his or her interviewees?  Is it doing the subjects a favor or a disservice to clean up their words a bit?  Or is that ethically wrong?  Where is the line?

Jon Franklin, a  a two-time Pulitzer winner who now teaches journalism and creative writing at the University of Oregon, says this:

“I’ve changed quotes and I’ve been accused of changing quotes, but I have never been accused of changing a quote I actually changed…People don’t say what they mean, and they expect you to quote what they mean, not what they say. That is slippery, but it’s the reality.”

Susan Feeney, a national political reporter for the Dallas Morning News, says this:

“You can’t. You can’t fix quotes. Period…If somebody speaks in a way in which quoting them is incomprehensible, you don’t use the quote. You use partial quotes. I don’t fix them. Ever.”

What do you think?

To find out more about this debate- read an article that quotes many journalists (correctly?  lets hope!) here.

 

2,440 thoughts on “Should journalists change quotes? Ever?

  1. Magnolia STEM School
    Magnolia Public Schools offers 11 campuses in California including Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, and Santa Clara. Magnolia focuses on STEM education, which is emphasis on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *